As each New Year rolls around I can’t help but think about the mental ‘gear-shifting’ that will be required to live in a New Year (e.g., writing ‘2007’ on bank checks, letters, invoices, receipts, etc.). And just about the time I’ve got it down I find we’re again creeping up to another new year change. What I also think about each new year—as I’m sure many followers of Jesus do—is the significance of the modern world using Anno Domini (In the Year of our Lord) to delineate one year from another.
The Anno Domini era calendar that we use today (calculated by the mathematician/astronomer monk, Dionysius Exiguus, or “Denis the Little,” in the 6th Century) is assumed to be dated from the birth of Jesus of Nazareth (which supposes that Jesus was born in A.D. 1). However, from hind sight we now know that Augustus, the Roman Caesar or King who ruled during the birth of Jesus (Luke 2:1), ended his rule when he died in about 4 B.C. And given a few other facts, such as King Herod’s command to kill children 2 years and younger (Matthew 2:16), it is more likely that Jesus was born sometime between 6-4 B.C. (for more on the dating of Jesus’ birth, see Paul Maier’s article, “The Times and Places of Jesus“).
What strikes me in all this is that the world marks it’s progression of time not with the rise of any great governmental or military leader, nor with the arrival of one great nation or another, but by the appearance of a Palestinian Jewish peasant.  A peasant who never wrote a book, constructed a building, or even traveled more than 200 miles from the place of his birth. As someone has written, “He never did one of the things that usually accompany greatness.”  And yet, we mark the succession of our lives and world history by this apparent ‘nobody.’ A ‘nobody’ who, in comparison to all great world leaders and daunting empires, is boldly superior.
In his book, Jesus Among Other Gods, Ravi Zacharias quotes the words of skeptic turned follower of Jesus, Malcolm Muggeridge. Muggeridge brilliantly writes:
We look back upon history, and what do we see? Empires rising and falling. Revolutions and Counterrevolutions. Wealth accumulated and wealth disbursed. Shakespeare has written of the rise and fall of great ones, that ebb and flow with the moon. I look back upon my own fellow countrymen, once upon a time dominating a quarter of the world, most of them convinced, in the words of what is still a popular song, that the God who made them mighty, shall make them mightier yet.I’ve heard a crazed, cracked Austrian announce to the world the establishment of a Reich that would last a thousand years. I have seen an Italian clown say he was going to stop and restart the calendar with his own ascension to power. I’ve heard a murderous Georgian brigand in the Kremlin, acclaimed by the intellectual elite of the world as wiser than Solomon, more humane than Marcus Aurelius, more enlightened than Ashoka.I have seen America, wealthier and in terms of military weaponry, more powerful than the rest of the world put together, so that had the American people so desired, they could have outdone a Caesar, or an Alexander in the range and scale of their conquests. All in one lifetime, all in one lifetime, all gone. Gone with the wind.England part of a tiny island off the coast of Europe, threatened with dismemberment and even bankruptcy. Hitler and Mussolini dead, remembered only in infamy.  Stalin a forbidden name in the regime he helped found and dominate for some three decades. America haunted by fears of running our of those precious fluids that keeps their motorways roaring, and the smog settling, with troubled memories of a disastrous campaign in Vietnam, and the victories of the Don Quixotes of the media as they charged the windmills of Watergate. All in one lifetime, all in one lifetime, all gone. Gone with the wind.
Zacharias concludes Muggeridge’s words with his own, “Behind the debris of these solemn supermen, and self-styled imperial diplomatists, there stands the gigantic figure of one, because of whom, by whom, in whom and through whom alone, mankind may still have peace: The person of Jesus Christ. I present him as the way, the truth, and the life.”
3 Comments on “2007! What we should be reminded of each New Year.”
Brent:
For the first 25 years of my life I was raised as Catholic. I won’t go into the details of the history of the Catholic Church, but at age 70, I would offer that you are making the Mary situation too hard, and, perhaps, you may be all wet.
The immaculate conception was the fact that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit (Ghost) -not be man. This makes it immaculate or Pure. Mary was a simple Godly woman, as many of us try to be Godly. Mary was a sinner, as was and is every human who ever lived. The poor Catholics got off track when the council at Nicea began with all of that man created doctrine which is inculcated into the minds of Catholics via the catechism instead of the Bible. I could go on, but will stop.
Actually, I am a missionary about to begin a new project in Guatemala and was looking for any folks who could give me info on an area south os Escuintla which is south of the city of Guatemala.
Best to you, tom doyle
Tom, thanks for the response. I’d encourage you to contact Pastor Frank, our mission’s pastor, with questions regarding Guatemala, as he’s taking well over a dozen trips there (http://www.medicalmissionnetwork.org/blog/). Tom, as I wrote in my post from the other day, what you are referring to by the sinless birth of Jesus is called “Virgin Birth,” NOT the “Immaculate Conception.” The latter concept is not something that Protestants believe. I also wouldn’t trace any of the problematic Catholic doctrines to the Council of Nicaea. I hope that you and I both (along with all other Believers) would be able to affirm every element in the Nicene Creed. If you haven’t read it before, I’d encourage you to look it up (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed#Comparison_between_creed_of_325_and_creed_of_381). It’s a bit like an expanded version of “The Apostles’ Creed,” which I’m sure you know.
Thomas Doyle, thank you for clarifying the Mary subject. 🙂 Amen.